Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Grant

That's French for "the ancient system," as in the ancient system of feudal privileges and the exercise of autocratic power over the peasants. The ancien regime never goes away, like vampires and dinosaur bones they are always hidden in the earth, exercising a mysterious influence. It is not paranoia to believe that the elites scheme against the common man. Inform yourself about their schemes here.

Re: Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Gr

Postby admin » Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:09 am

8: Human Weeds

We are not so very far off from even the sacrifice of babies—if not to a crocodile, at least to a creed.

-- G. K. Chesterton1


Planned Parenthood officials have always tried to deflect any criticism of their founder’s radical and racist worldview. Though they have managed all manner of epistimological gymnastics and historical revisionism in a feeble attempt to deny it, hide it, and belie it, Margaret was undeniably mesmerized by the fashionable elitism of Malthusian Eugenics.2

Part of the attraction for her was obviously political: virtually all of her Socialist friends, lovers, and comrades were committed Eugenicists—from the followers of Lenin in Revolutionary Socialism like H. G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, and Julius Hammer, to the followers of Hitler in National Socialism, like Ernest Rudin, Leon Whitney, and Harry Laughlin.

And part of the attraction for her was also personal: her mentor and lover, Havelock Ellis, was the beloved disciple of Francis Gabon, the brilliant cousin of Charles Darwin who first systemized and popularized Eugenic thought.

But it was not simply politics or sentiment that drew Margaret into the Eugenic fold. She was thoroughly convinced that the “inferior races” were in fact “human weeds” and a “menace to civilization.” She really believed that “social regeneration” would only be possible as the “sinister forces of the hordes of irresponsibility and imbecility” were repulsed. She had come to regard organized charity to ethnic minorities and the poor as a “symptom of a malignant social disease” because it encouraged the profligacy of those “defective, delinquents, and dependents” she so obviously abhorred. She yearned for the end of the Christian “reign of benevolence” that the Eugenic Socialists promised, when the “choking human undergrowth” of “morons and imbeciles” would be “segregated” and ultimately “sterilized.” Her greatest aspiration was “to create a race of thoroughbreds” by encouraging “more children from the fit, and less from the unfit.” And the only way to achieve that dystopic goal, she realized, was through the harsh and coercive tyranny of Malthusian Eugenics.3

In other words, she was a true believer, not simply someone who assimilated the jargon of the times—as Planned Parenthood officials would have us believe. She was a committed elitist bent on undermining the familial bonds of the poor and disenfranchised.4

Thus, as she began to build the work of the American Birth Control League, and ultimately, of planned Parenthood, Margaret relied heavily on the men, women, ideas, and resources of the Eugenics movement. Virtually all of the organization’s board members were Eugenicists. Financing for the early projects—from the opening of the first birth control clinics to the publishing of the revolutionary literature—came from Eugenicists. The speakers at the conferences, the authors of the propaganda, and the providers of the services were almost without exception avid Eugenicists. And as if that rather substantial evidence were not enough, the international work of Planned parenthood was originally housed in the offices of the Eugenics Society—while the organizations themselves are institutionally intertwined even to this day.

The Birth Control Review —Margaret’s magazine and the immediate predecessor to the Planned Parenthood Review —regularly and openly published the racist articles of Malthusian Eugenicists. In October of 1920, for instance, it published a favorable review of Lothrop Stoddard’s frightening book of Fascist diatribe, The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy. In September of 1923, the Review editorialized in favor of restricting immigration on a racial basis. In April of 1932, it outlined Margaret’s “Plan for peace,” which called for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks.” In April of 1933, the Review published a shocking article entitled “Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need.” It was written by Margaret’s close friend and advisor, Ernst Rudin, who was then serving as Hitler’s director of genetic sterilization and had earlier taken a prominent role in the establishment of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. Later, in June of that same year, it published an article by Leon Whitney entitled, “Selective Sterilization,” which adamantly praised and defended the Third Reich’s pre-holocaust “race purification” programs.

The bottom line is that Margaret self-consciously organized the Birth Control League -- and its progeny, Planned Parenthood—in part, to promote and enforce the scientifically elitist notions of White Supremacy. Like the Ku Klux Klan, the Nazi Party, and the Mensheviks, Margaret’s enterprise was from its inception implicitly and explicitly racist. And this racist orientation was all too evident in its various programs and initiatives: government control over family decisions, non-medicinal health care experimentations, the rabid abortion crusade, and the coercive sterilization initiatives.

Margaret’s first wild stab at opening a birth control clinic, for example, was strategically aimed at the impoverished and densely populated Brownsville section of Brooklyn. The ramshackle two-room back alley hovel was a far cry from Margaret’s plush Greenwich Village haunts. But since the clientele she wished to attract, the “dysgenic immigrant Southern Europeans, Slavs, Latins, and Jews,” could only be lured into her snare there “in the coarser neighborhoods and tenements,” she was forced to venture out of her more familiar and comfortable confines.

As her organization grew in power and prestige, she began to target several other “ill-favored” and “dysgenic races, “including “Blacks, Hispanics, Amerinds, Fundamentalists, and Catholics."5 If was not long before she set up clinics in their respective communities as well. Margaret and the Malthusian Eugenicists she had gathered about her were not partial; every non-Aryan—red, yellow, black, or white— all were noxious in their sight. They sought to place new clinics wherever those “feeble-minded, syphilitic, irresponsible, and defective” stocks “bred unhindered.” Since by their estimation as much as 70 percent of the population fell into this “undesirable” category, Margaret and her cohorts really had their work cut out for them.

But they were more than up to the task.

In 1939, Margaret designed a “Negro Project” in response to requests from “southern state public health officials”—men not generally known for their racial equanimity.6 “The mass of Negroes,” her project proposal asserted, “particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among Whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit.” The proposal went on to say that “Public Health statistics merely hint at the primitive state of civilization in which most Negroes in the South live.”7

In order to remedy this “dysgenic horror story,” her project aimed to hire three or four “Colored Ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities” to travel to various Black enclaves and propagandize for birth control. Her intention was as insidious as it was obvious:

The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the Minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.9


Of course, those Black ministers were to be carefully controlled—mere figureheads. “There is a great danger that we will fail,” one of the project directors wrote, “because the Negroes think it a plan for extermination. Hence, let’s appear to let the colored run it.” Another project director lamented:

I wonder if Southern Darkies can ever be entrusted with ... a clinic. Our experience causes us to doubt their ability to work except under White supervision.


The entire operation then was a ruse -- a manipulative attempt to get Blacks to cooperate in their own elimination.10

Sadly, the project was quite successful. Its genocidal intentions were carefully camouflaged beneath several layers of condescending social service rhetoric and organizational expertise. Like the citizens of Hamlin, lured into captivity by the sweet serenades of the Pied Piper, all too many Blacks across the country happily fell into step behind Margaret and the Eugenic racists she had placed on her Negro Advisory Council.

Soon clinics throughout the South were distributing contraceptives to Blacks and Margaret’s dream of discouraging “the defective and diseased elements of humanity” from their “reckless and irresponsible swarming and spawning” was at last being fulfilled.

The strategy was of course racial and not geographical. The Southern states were picked simply because of the high proportion of Blacks in their populations. In later decades, expansion to the North and West occurred. But the basic guidelines remained: the proportion of minorities in a community was closely related to the density of birth control clinics.

The “champion of birth control” and the “patron saint of feminism” was no less horrific in her disdain for the helpless and the hapless than any of the other monsters of progressivism during the first half of the twentieth century—Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and Mao. The only difference is that they have all been duly discredited, while she has not—at least, not yet.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36126
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Gr

Postby admin » Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:21 am

PART FIVE: To Be or Not to Be

What I complain of is the shallowness of people who only do things for a change and then actually talk as if the change were unchangeable. That is the weakness of a purely progressive theory. The very latest opinion is always infallibly right and always inevitably wrong. — G. K. Chesterton1


9: A New World Order

Civilization is only one of the things that men choose to have. Convince them of its uselessness and they would fling away civilization as they fling away a cigar.

-- G. K. Chesterton2


In 1925, Margaret hosted an International neo-Malthusian and birth control conference at the tiny Hotel McAlpin in New York. She had grown increasingly concerned that societal, civic, and religious pressure might snuff out her nascent Eugenic ideals. As she asserted:

The government of the United States deliberately encourages and even makes necessary by its laws the breeding—with a breakneck rapidity -- of idiots, defective, diseased, feeble-minded, and criminal classes. Billions of dollars are expended by our state and federal governments and by private charities and philanthropies for the care, the maintenance, and the perpetuation of these classes. Year by year their numbers are mounting. Year by year more money is expended ... to maintain an increasing race of morons which threatens the very foundations of our civilization.3


She was especially distressed by the dim prospects that democratic suffrage afforded her dystopic plans to implement a universal system of inhuman humanism:

We can all vote, even the mentally arrested. And so it is no surprise to find that the moron’s vote is as good as the vote of the genius. The outlook is not a cheerful one.4


If there was little for her to cheer about in America, there was even less on the international scene. Europe, decimated by the Great War, was desperate to reverse its dramatic decline in population, while the developing world was no less desperate to stoke the hopeful fires of progress with aggressive population growth. Despite the fast start of her various enterprises, her message was falling on increasingly deaf ears.

By convening dozens of like-minded “neo-Malthusian pioneers” from around the world, she was hopeful that together they would be able to circle the wagons, to “develop a new evangelistic strategy,” and ultimately to reverse the tide of public opinion and public policy— and thus “to keep alive and carry on the torch of neo-Malthusian truth.”5

For six days representatives from France, England, Norway, Holland, Austria, Hungary, Germany, Belgium, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, Portugal, India, South Africa, Russia, Mexico, Canada, Japan, and China listened as “experts” delivered papers, made speeches, held workshops, and offered dire prophecies.

They suggested new political tactics. They crafted coy public relations schemes. And they hammered out a bevy of priorities, agendas, and schedules. In addition to all that, they harked to plenary portents, admonitions, and jeremiads that:

The dullard, the gawk, the numbskull, the simpleton, the weakling, and the scatterbrain are amongst us in overshadowing numbers— intermarrying, breeding, inordinately prolific, literally threatening to overwhelm the world with their useless and terrifying get.6


By the end of the conference it was apparent to all of them that unless they took “a course of drastic action the world would face certain eminent disaster.” Many had been involved in some sort of subversive sex-activism for quite some time—each of the participants claimed membership in the International Federation of Neo-Malthusian Leagues and most were leaders in the International Eugenics Society. Even so, the time for united purpose and concerted effort was clearly at hand. A loose federation of “race hygiene societies,“ “birth control leagues,” “family planning associations,” and “social Eugenics committees” was formalized. Drawing on the heritage of Annie Besant, Charles Bradlaugh, Charles Drysdale, and Alice Vickery— all radicals and aspiring social engineers from an earlier generation —the new federation took a self-consciously presuppositional anti-Christian, anti-family, and anti-choice bent from the start.

The federation would not be incorporated as International planned Parenthood until a reorganizational meeting in Bombay shortly after the Second World War, but it remained active during the intervening years nonetheless. Sharing both offices and resources with their kith and kin in the International Eugenics Society, the members did not want to hurry the careful conception of their strategic plan unnecessarily. Thus, it was during that developmental period that Margaret and the other leaders laid the philosophical foundations that characterize the organization and its multifarious programs to this day.

They made certain, for instance, that all national affiliates would adhere to a stridently pro-abortion stance. In fact, they determined that all Planned Parenthood associations—regardless of social, cultural, or political con¬ texts—make “legal access” to “unrestricted abortion” a “high priority.” As Malcolm Potts, the medical director for the international federation, admitted years later:

The fact is, that no nation on earth has controlled its fertility without abortion. The United States has 1.5 million abortions a year. Why should we expect Indonesia, say, to do better? No matter how good the method is, you can’t get adequate fertility control with contraception alone. You have got to grapple with sterilization and abortion.7


They also made certain that the national affiliates pressed for coercive government action to enforce birth limitations and Eugenic sterilizations. They encouraged national organizations to weigh the necessity of “limiting freedom of choice” through the imposition of legal and economic reproductive incentives and disincentives. Such sanctions might include the “introduction of a child tax,” “reduction or elimination of paid maternity leave and benefits, “ “limitation or elimination of public-financed medical care, scholarships, housing loans, and subsidies to families with more than the allowed number of children,” or even, “compulsory sterilizations and abortions.”8

In later years, that preferential bent toward totalitarianism led Planned Parenthood to laud the brutal one-child-per-family program of the Communist Chinese as a “stunning success” that was “worth our attention and awe.” They made certain that each national affiliate would develop and implement “value-free” sex- education curricula and programs. They advocated the kinds of programs that the American affiliate pioneered—using perverse off-the-shelf commercial pornography in elementary classrooms, undermining traditional values, usurping the authority of parents, and encouraging promiscuous activity.

Accordingly, the international literature policy asserts:

The broad abstract principles inspired by an antique, repressive morality serve only to confuse us. . . . As hard as it is to admit sexual precocity is a fact that is present, progressive, and irreversible. . . . Only those who admit, accept, and validate the possibility of an early exercise of sexuality will have placed themselves in a condition to be able to channel it through education.9


They even mandated that each national affiliate be willing to overcome any legal obstacles that might impede the overarching Planned Parenthood agenda of Eugenic cleansing through various forms of legal challenges, popular protests, and acts of civil disobedience. At times that might mean merely sidestepping the law: in the Philippines where abortions are illegal. Planned Parenthood offers “menstrual extractions” instead-despite the fact that the procedures are, for all intents and purposes, technically the same. At other times clear violation of the law is perpetrated: in Brazil, where sterilization is illegal. Planned Parenthood performs as many as 20 million procedures every year in its field clinics.10

According to one internal directive issued from the London office:

Family Planning Associations and other non-government organizations should not use the absence of the law or the existence of an unfavorable law as an excuse for inaction; action outside the law, and even in violation of it, is part of the process of stimulating change.11


Though these ideas were more than a little radical, their careful presentation and prudent institutionalization— under the ever watchful management of Margaret and the other neo-Malthusians -- eventually paid off. And it paid off in huge dividends.

Ultimately, most of Planned parenthood’s neo-Malthusian ideas found their way into some of the most significant political, cultural, and social programs of the twentieth century as modern presuppositional tenets of an aggressive and universal politically correct orthodoxy. Unlikely support for the ideas sprang up everywhere. Opposition practically evaporated. Within just a few years, the revolution that Margaret had hoped for and dreamed of had become a veritable reality.

Adolf Hitler, for instance, adopted the neo-Malthusian ideas of Margaret and her friends in a wholesale fashion in his administration of the Third Reich—his exterminative “final solution”; his coercive abortion program in Poland, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia; and his elitist National Socialism. He echoed the Malthusian call to “rid the earth of dysgenic peoples by whatever means available so that we may enjoy the prosperity of the Fatherland.” And he reiterated the Planned Parenthood ideal of eliminating all Christian mercy ministries or social service programs. “Let us spend our efforts and our resources,” he cried in a frenetic speech in 1939, “on the productive, not on the wastrel.”

Josef Stalin also wove Planned Parenthood’s neo-Malthusian ideal into his brutal interpretation of Marxism—his Ukrainian triage, his collectivization of the Kulaks, and his Siberian genocide. ‘He argued that, “The greatest obstacle to the successful completion of the people’s revolution is the swarming of inferior races from the south and east.” And the only thing that kept him from eliminating that obstacle was “the foolhardy interference of church charity.”

The concessions to Margaret’s malignant philosophy did not end there. Before long, the Planned Parenthood planners and prognosticators were riding a veritable tidal wave of success as one political system after another capitulated to the intolerant demands of Eugenicism:

• In 1938, Sweden became the first free nation in Christendom to revert to pre-Christian abortion legislation and to institutionalize Planned Parenthood sex-education and family limitation programs.
• Between 1949 and 1956, abortion was legalized in another eleven European nations—each at the behest of Planned Parenthood.
• In 1954, planned Parenthood held an international conference on abortion and called for “reform” of restrictive legislation.
• In 1958, various United Nations agencies began to subsidize Planned parenthood projects and programs throughout the developing world.
• In 1962, the American Law Institute proposed that abortion laws be decriminalized.
• In 1967, the American Medical Association reversed its century-old commitment to protect the lives of the unborn and also began calling for decriminalization and destigmatization of abortion.
• During that same year, three states -- Colorado, California, and North Carolina—loosened restrictions on certain child-killing procedures.
• In 1968, the United Kingdom legalized abortion.
• Later that year, Pope Paul VI issued his Humanae Vitae encyclical which, among other things, reaffirmed the church’s commitment to the sanctity of life. Since this seemed to be the lone Christian voice of dissent during a massive juggernaut of neo-pagan revivalism, the abortion issue quickly came to be viewed in the public arena as a Catholic issue.
• In 1970, four additional American states—Hawaii, Alaska, Washington, and New York—enacted abortion-on-demand legislation.
• By the end of 1971, nearly half a million legal abortions were being performed in the U.S. each year and another two million were performed world-wide.
• Then in 1973, the Supreme Court issued its momentous Roe v. Wade decree that altered the moral landscape of modern America in a single act of sheer judicial fiat, thus signaling a keen message of relativism to the rest of the world.

And from there, things have only gone from bad to worse. Taking full advantage of its newfound global consensus, Planned Parenthood has launched a massive campaign to construct a New World Order in accord with Margaret’s original revolutionary design.

As unlikely as it seemed when she first began her lurid campaign, Margaret had succeeded—with a vengeance.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36126
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Gr

Postby admin » Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:27 am

10: The Marrying Kind

The wisdom of man alters with every age; his prudence has to fit perpetually shifting shapes of inconvenience or dilemma. But his folly is immortal: a fire stolen from heaven.

—G. K. Chesterton1


Despite her stunning success, Margaret was miserable. Her private life was in utter shambles. Her marriage, of course, had ended long ago. During one of many long absences, her daughter caught cold and ultimately died of pneumonia. Her boys were neglected and forgotten. And her once ravishing beauty was fading with age and abuse.

Desperate to find meaning and happiness, she lost herself in a profusion of sexual liaisons. She went from one lover to another, sometimes several in a single day. She experimented with innumerable erotic fantasies and fetishes, but satisfaction always eluded her grasp. She began to dabble in the occult, participating in seances and practicing Eastern meditation. She even went so far as to apply for initiation into the mysteries of Rosicrucianism and Theosophy.

When all else failed, she turned to the one thing that she knew would bring her solace: once again, she married into money.

J. Noah Slee was the president of the Three-in-One Oil Company and a legitimate millionaire. A conservative church-going Episcopalian, he opposed everything that Margaret stood for but found her irresistible anyway.

At first, Margaret resisted his pleas for marriage. She still believed that it was a “degenerate institution.” But nine million dollars was a mighty temptation—a temptation she simply could not resist.

But just to make certain that the new relationship would not interfere with her sordid affairs and her vicious cause, she drew up a prenuptial agreement that Slee was forced to sign just before the wedding ceremony. It stipulated that Margaret would be free to come and go as she pleased with no questions asked. She was to have her own apartment and servants within her husband’s home, where she could entertain “friends” of her own choosing-behind closed doors. Furthermore, Slee would have to telephone her from the other end of the house even to ask for a dinner date.

Margaret told her lovers that with that document, the marriage would make little or no difference in her life-apart from the convenience of the money, of course. And she went out of her way to prove it; she flaunted her promiscuity and infidelity every chance she could get.

She was still terribly unhappy, but at least now she was terribly rich, too.

Immediately, Margaret set herself to the task of using her new wealth to further the cause. She opened a new clinic—this time calling it a “Research Bureau” in order to avoid legal tangles. Then she began to smuggle diaphragms into the country from Holland. She waged several successful “turf battles to maintain control over her “empire.” She campaigned diligently to win over the medical community. She secured massive foundation grants from the Rockefeller, the Fords, and the Mellons. She took her struggle to Washington, testifying before several congressional committees, advocating the liberalization of contraceptive prescription laws. And she fought for the incorporation of reproductive control into state programs as a form of social planning. With her almost unlimited financial resources, she was able to open doors and pull strings that had heretofore been entirely inaccessible to her.

Margaret was also able to use her newfound wealth to fight an important public relations campaign to redeem her reputation—which, despite her success, bore the taint of radicalism and social disruption. Because of her Malthusian and Eugenic connections, she had willingly become closely associated with the scientists and theorists who put together Nazi Germany’s “race purification” program. She had openly endorsed the euthanasia, sterilization, abortion, and infanticide programs of the early Reich. She happily published a number of articles in The Birth Control Review that mirrored Hitler’s Aryan-White Supremacist rhetoric. She even commissioned her friend, Ernst Rudin, the director of the Nazi Medical Experimentation program, to serve the organization as an advisor.

Naturally, when World War II broke out and the grisly details of the Nazi programs began to come to light, Margaret was forced to backpedal her position and cover up her complicity. The Great Depression had been a boon for racist and Eugenic arguments, but those days were now past. Charges of anti-Semitism had been harmlessly hurled at her since her trial in 1917, but now that Auschwitz and Dachau had become very much a part of the public conscience, she realized she would have to do something, and quickly.

Her first step toward redeeming her public image was to change the name of her organization. “Planned Parenthood” was a name that had been proposed from within the birth control movement since at least 1938. One of the arguments for the new name was that it connoted a positive program and conveyed a clean, wholesome, family-oriented image. It diverted attention from the international and revolutionary Eugenic intentions of the movement, focusing instead on the personal and individual dimensions of birth control. By 1942, it was decided. The organization would be called the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Next, she embarked on an aggressive affiliation program that brought hundreds of local and regional birth control leagues under the umbrella of a national organization, and then dozens of national organizations were brought under the umbrella of an international organization. This enabled Margaret to draw on the integrity and respectability of grassroots organizations, solidifying and securing her place at the top.

Finally, she initiated a massive propaganda blitz aimed at the war-weary, ready-for-prosperity middle class. Always careful to hide her illicit affairs and her radical political leanings, her campaign emphasized patriotism, personal choice, and family values.

Before long, Margaret’s brilliant strategy had won for her, and for Planned Parenthood, the admiration and respect of virtually the entire nation and certainly of the entire social services community.

It is said that it takes money to make money. Soon, Margaret was able to prove the truth of this truism.

From its earliest days, Planned Parenthood wooed corporations, foundations, celebrities, and charities in the hopes of securing operating capital. With her newly minted respectability—bought with Slee’s bottomless coffers—Margaret was able to open the treasury of American corporate philanthropy in an unprecedented fashion.

She had rubbed shoulders and shared beds with the radical chic throughout the roaring twenties—the artists, actors, writers, musicians, and activists in New York’s chic Village and London’s mod Fabian Enclave. She now shrewdly used her proximity to them to promote her revolutionary ideas. And she carefully networked with them to gain contacts in the political and financial world.

Single-minded in her commitment to the cause, her persistence and unflagging enthusiasm began to open doors. She was tireless and driven. Some even said she was “possessed”—which, no doubt, she was. At any rate, her crusade quickly became a cause celebre. By the thirties, corporation grants and foundation bequests began to pour the money into her war chest. By the forties, she had won the endorsements of such notables as Eleanor Roosevelt and Katherine Hepburn. By the fifties, she had attained international renown and counted among her supporters Julian Huxley, Albert Einstein, Nehru, John D. Rockefeller, Emperor Hirohito, and Henry Ford. The sixties brought her tremendous fame and acceptance. Before her death, she received the enthusiastic endorsements of former Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower. She won over arch-conservatives like Barry Goldwater and arch-liberals li]p Margaret Mead. Ideology did not seem to matter.2

In addition, Margaret Sanger was a tenacious organizer. Her days with the Socialist Party and the Communist Labor movement not only trained her in effective propaganda techniques, they taught her how to solicit, train, and activate volunteers. Using these skills, Margaret literally combed the country, and ultimately the world, searching for donors. She left no stone unturned. She applied for every grant, appealed to every foundation, made presentations to every corporation, and appealed to every charity. She wanted a piece of every philanthropic pie, and she would go to great pains to make her case to any who would listen. She was a dogged promoter. And, like the persistent widow in Christ’s parable, she was so unrelenting, she prevailed more times than not (see Luke 18: 1-8).

Perhaps Margaret’s greatest coup came when she was able to gain for her organization an IRS charitable tax-exempt status. That move put Planned Parenthood in the same legal category as a local church or a philanthropic society. All donations became tax-deductible, and that made solicitation and donor development all too easy.

The fund-raising apparatus that she set in place has only grown in size and sophistication in the years since she died. It has garnered hundreds of celebrity endorsements. It has affiliated with every major national and international professional and educational association even remotely related to Planned Parenthood’s work. And it has tapped into the fiscal lifeblood of virtually every major charitable resource available.

Of course, these tremendous successes did little to ease the ache of Margaret’s perpetual unhappiness. She continued her sordid and promiscuous affairs even after old age and poor health had overtaken her. Her pathetic attraction to occultism deepened. And perhaps worst of all, by 1949 she had become addicted to both drugs and alcohol.

That improvidence was almost her undoing.

From its earliest days, the Planned Parenthood movement had been involved in financial scandal. Despite the fact that she received generous donations from some of the richest philanthropies in the world, Margaret kept her organization on the brink of bankruptcy for years, failing to pay her bills and refusing to give an account of her mismanagement.3

Financial disclosure would certainly have brought disaster upon her—as well as upon her fledgling operation. She often spent Planned Parenthood money for her own extravagant pleasures, for instance. She invested organizational funds in the black market. She squandered hard-won bequests on frivolities. And she wasted the money she had gotten “by hook or by crook” on her unrestrained vanities.

Because of her wastrel indiscretions, she was quietly removed from the Planned Parenthood board several times, but the organization found that it simply could not survive without her. In the end, Planned Parenthood was forced to take on the character and attributes of its founder. “The love of money is the root of all evil” (see 1 Tim. 6:10). Violence and greed are inseparable (see Prov. 1 :8-9). Thus, Planned Parenthood’ s evil agenda of violence to women and children cannot be cut loose from the deep tap root of avarice and material lust that Margaret planted.

Sexual immorality, theft, adultery, covetousness, greed, malice, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, lasciviousness, arrogance, blasphemy, pride, ruthlessness, and folly are all related sins (see Mark 7:21-22). They commonly coexist (see Rem. 1 :29—31 ). Certainly they did in the tortured concupiscence of Margaret Sanger. And they still do, in the organization that honors her as pioneer and champion.

By the time she died on September 6, 1966, a week shy of her eighty-seventh birthday, Margaret Sanger had nearly fulfilled her early boast that she would spend every last penny of Slee’s fortune. In the process, though, she had lost everything else: love, happiness, satisfaction, fulfillment, family, and friends. In the end, her struggle was for naught.

“For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, but to lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?” (see Mark 8:36-37).
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36126
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Gr

Postby admin » Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:46 am

PART SIX: How Should We Then Live?

The business of progressives is to keep on making mistakes. The business of conservatives is to prevent the mistakes being corrected. Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as a part of his tradition. Thus we have the two great types — the advanced person who rushes us to ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins.

-- G. K. Chesterton1


11: Root and Fruit

The advantage of being a sentimentalist is that you only remember what you like to remember.

-- G. K. Chesterton2


JUST AS A NATION’S “HEAD" DEFINES THE CHARACTER and vision of that nation, so an organization’s “head” defines the character and vision of that organization. This is a very basic Biblical principle. It is the principle of “legacy.” It is the principle of “inheritance.”

The Canaanite people were perverse and corrupt. They practiced every manner of wickedness and reprobation. Why were they so dissolute? The answer, according to the Bible, is that their founders and leaders passed evil onto them as their legacy, as their inheritance (see Gen. 9:25; Lev. 18:24-25; Amos 1:3-12).

Similarly, the Moabites and the Ammonites were a rebellious and improvident people. They railed against God’s Word and God’s people. Why were they so defiant? Again, the Bible tells us that their founders and leaders passed insurrection onto them as their legacy, as their inheritance (see Gen. 19:30-38; Num. 21:21—23; Amos 1:13-15; 2:1-3).

A seed will always yield its own kind (see Gen. 1:11 ). Bad seed brings forth bitter harvest (see Ezra 9:2; Isa. 1:4; 14:20). You reap what you sow (see Gal. 6:7). A nation or an organization that is sown, nurtured, and grown by deceit, promiscuity, and lawlessness, cannot help but be evil to the core (see Hos. 8:7).

Planned Parenthood is a paradigmatical illustration of this principle. Margaret Sanger’s character and vision are perfectly mirrored in the organization that she wrought. She intended it that way. And the leaders that have come after her have in no wise attempted to have it another way.

Dr. Alan Guttmacher, the man who immediately succeeded her as president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, once said, “We are merely walking down the path that Mrs. Sanger carved out for us.” Faye Wattleton, president of the organization during the decade of the eighties, has claimed that she is “proud” to be “walking in the footsteps of Margaret Sanger.” And the president of the New York affiliate is Alexander Sanger, her grandson.3

Thus, virtually everything that she believed, everything that she aspired to, everything that she practiced, and everything that she aimed for is somehow reflected in the organization and program of Planned Parenthood, even today. The frightening thing about Planned Parenthood’s historical legacy is that the legacy is not just historical. It is as current as tomorrow morning’s newspaper.

• Abortion. In her book Woman and the New Race, Margaret asserted that, “The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it.”4 Today, Planned Parenthood’s commitment to that philosophy is self-evident. The organization is the world’s number one abortion provider and agitator. It has aggressively fought the issue through the courts. It has made killing infant members of large families its highest priority. Bad seed brings forth bitter harvest. The legacy continues.
• Promiscuity. Like her mentors Emma Goldman and Havelock Ellis, Margaret was not content to keep her lascivious and concupiscent behavior to herself. She was a zealous evangelist for free love. Even in her old age, she persisted in proselytizing her sixteen-year-old granddaughter, telling her that kissing, petting, and even intercourse were fine as long as she was “sincere,” and that having sex about “three times a day” was “just about right.”5 Today, planned Parenthood’s commitment, to undermining the moral values of teens is evident in virtually all its literature. It teaches kids to masturbate. It endorses premarital fornication. It approves of homosexuality. It encourages sexual experimentation. It vilifies Christian values, prohibitions, and consciences. Bad seed brings forth bitter harvest. The legacy continues.
• Socialism. Margaret Sanger was committed to the revolution. She wanted to overthrow the old order of Western Christendom and usher in a “New Age.” Though in her latter years she toned down her radical rhetoric, she never wavered from that stance. Today, Planned Parenthood continues to carry the banner for big government, big spending, and free-wheeling liberal causes and agendas. Even the normally sedate Wall Street Journal had to admit that “planned parenthood’s love affair with Socialism has become more than a harmless upper middle- class hobby and now borders on the ludicrous.”6 Bad seed brings forth bitter harvest. The legacy continues.
• Greed. When Leon Trotsky came to the United States briefly in 1917, he met Margaret and her friends and came away with a feeling of great revulsion. In his memoirs, he recorded nothing but distaste for the rich, smug Socialists he encountered in the Village. He said they were little better than “hypocritical Babbits,” referring to the Sinclair Lewis character who used his parlor-room Socialism as a screen for personal ambition and self-aggrandizement.7 Sanger and the other Village elitists were revolutionaries only to the extent that Socialism did not conflict with wealth, luxury, and political influence. Today, Planned Parenthood’s commitment to the revolution continues to hinge on that unswerving pursuit of “filthy lucre.” From its dogged preoccupation with government contracts, grants, and bequests, to its commercial ventures, investments, and vocations, its mercenary avariciousness is everywhere apparent. Bad seed brings forth bitter harvest. The legacy continues.
• Religion. In her first newspaper, The Woman Rebel, Margaret Sanger admitted that “Birth control appeals to the advanced radical because it is calculated to undermine the authority of the Christian churches. I look forward to seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than Capitalism.”* Today, planned Parenthood is continuing her crusade against the church. In its advertisements, in its literature, in its programs, and in its policies, the organization makes every attempt to mock, belittle, and undermine Biblical Christianity. Bad seed brings forth bitter harvest. The legacy continues.
• Deceit. Throughout her life, Margaret Sanger developed a rakish and reckless pattern of dishonesty. She twisted the truth about her qualifications as a nurse, about the details of her work, and about the various sordid addictions that controlled her life. Her autobiographies were filled with exaggerations, distortions, and out-and-out lies. She even went so far as to alter the records in her mother’s family Bible in order to protect her vanity. Today, Planned Parenthood faithfully carries on her tradition of disinformation. The organization continually misrepresents the facts about its lucrative birth control, sex education, and abortion enterprises. Bad seed brings forth bitter harvest. The legacy continues.

A recent Planned Parenthood report bore the slogan “Proud of Our Past—Planning the Future.”9 If that is true—if the organization really is proud of its venal and profligate past, and if it really is planning the future—then we all have much to be concerned about.

“Those who plow iniquity and those who sow trouble harvest it. By the breath of God they perish, and by the blast of His anger they come to an end” (Job 4:8-9).
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36126
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Gr

Postby admin » Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:50 am

12: The Big Lie

The new myth is generally a part of a new theory; not a confused remembrance, but a conscious reconstruction.

—G. K. Chesterton1


They say that she was “enlightened." They say she was “compassionate.” They say that she was a “champion of freedom.” They say she was concerned “first and foremost with the needs of the needy and the wants of the wanting.”2

Lies. Lies. Lies. All lies.

One after another, the hagiographical lies of Margaret’s faithful and fawning followers in Planned Parenthood, hallowed in near sanctity, blaze forth in a positive conflagration of revered shibboleths. Taken together, those lies comprise the lie. The Big Lie. The Grand Illusion. The Modern Myth.

Myths, according to theologian J. I. Packer, are “stories made up to sanctify social patterns."3 They are lies, carefully designed to reinforce a particular philosophy or morality within a culture. They are instruments of manipulation and control.

When Jeroboam splintered the nation of Israel after the death of Solomon, he thought that in order to consolidate his rule over the northern faction he would have to wean the people from their spiritual and emotional dependence on the Jerusalem temple. So he manufactured myths. He lied:

And Jeroboam said in his heart, “Now the kingdom will return to the house of David. If this people go up to offer sacrifices in the house of the Lord at Jerusalem, then the heart of this people will return to their lord, even to Rehoboam king of Judah; and they will kill me and return to Rehoboam king of Judah,” So the king consulted, and made two golden calves, and he said to them, “It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem; behold your gods, O Israel, that brought you up from the land of Egypt.” And he set one in Bethel, and the other he put in Dan. Now this thing became a sin, for the people went to worship before the one as far as Dan. And he made houses on high places, and made priests from among all the people who were not of the sons of Levi. And Jeroboam instituted a feast in the eighth month on the fifteenth day of the month, like the feast which is in Judah, and he went up to the altar; thus he did in Bethel, sacrificing to the calves which he had made. And he stationed in Bethel the priests of the high places which he had made. Then he went up to the altar which he had made in Bethel on the fifteenth day in the eighth month, even in the month which he had devised in his own heart; and he instituted a feast for the sons of Israel, and went up to the altar to burn incense. (1 Kings 12:26-33)


Jeroboam instituted a false feast at a false shrine, attended by false priests, before false gods, and all on a false pretense. But his lies succeeded in swaying the people. Jeroboam’s mythology sanctified a whole new set of social patterns. What would have been unthinkable before—idolatry, apostasy, and travesty—became almost overnight not only thinkable or acceptable, but conventional and habitual. As a result, the new king was able to manipulate and control his subjects.

The powerful, the would-be-powerful, and the wish-they-were-powerful have always relied on such tactics. Plato and Thucydides observed the phenomenon during Greece’s classical era. Plutarch and Augustine identified it during the Roman epoch. Sergios Kasilov and Basil Argyros noted it during the Byzantine millennium. Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas More recognized its importance during the European Renaissance. And Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Colin Thubron have pointed it out in our own time.

Most of the myth-makers never actually believed in the gods upon Olympus, across the River Styx, or within the Kremlin Palace. After all, they knew all too well from whence those lies came. But as high priests of deceit, they used the lies to dominate the hearts and minds and lives of the masses.

The Bible says that such men are full of deceitful words (see Ps. 36:3). Their counsel is deceitful (see Prov. 12:5). Their favor is deceitful (see Prov. 27:6). And their hearts are deceitful (see Mark 7:22). They defraud the unsuspecting (see Rem. 16: 18), displaying the spirit of the anti-Christ (see 2 John 7), all for the sake of wealth, prestige, and prerogative (see Prov. 21: 6).

Such puissance is in the long run all too fleeting, however (see Rev. 21:8), because myth-makers do not go unpunished (see Prov. 19:5). Ultimately, their sin finds them out (see Jer. 17:11).

Still, because their lies wreak havoc among the innocent (see Mic. 6:12), it is essential that we not be taken in. Not only are we to be alert to deception (see Eph. 4: 14), testing the words and deeds of the myth-makers against the Truth (see 1 John 4: 16), but we are to expose their deceptions as well (see Eph. 5:11).

Margaret Sanger—and her heirs at planned Parenthood—not at all unlike Jeroboam and the other infamous myth-makers throughout history, have thus far been able to parlay deception into a substantial empire. But now, the truth must be told. The illusion must be exposed. The Big Lie must be demythologized.

Therefore, go and tell:

“Woe to the bloody city, completely full of lies and pillage. Her prey never departs” (Nab. 3:1).
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36126
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Gr

Postby admin » Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:59 am

Notes

Acknowledgments


1. Illustrated London News (August 19, 1921).

2. Hilaire Belloc, The Path to Rome (London: Cassell’s, 1908), 4.

Introduction

1. Illustrated London News (December 23, 1933).

2. Harold Tribble Cole, The Coming Terror (New York: Languine, 1936), 23.

3. Coronet Magazine (March 1966).

4. Abraham Stern, The Margaret Sanger Story (Westport, Corm.: Greenwood Press, 1975).

5. Madeline Gray, Margaret Sanger: A Biography of the Champion of Birth Control (New York Richard Marek, 1979).

6. Zachary Keen, The Art of History (New York: Ball and Brothers, 1948), 34.

7. Hilaire Belloc, The Biographer’s Art: Excerpts from Belloc’s Florrid Pen (London: Catholic Union, 1956), 33.

8. Howard F. Pallin, cd., Literary English and Scottish Sermons, (London: Windus Etheridge, 1937), 101.

9. E. Michael Jones, Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1993), 9.

10. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, “1992 Annual Report,” 21.

11. Gray, Margaret Sanger.

12. PPFA, “Annual Report,” 21.

13.Ibid, 19.

14. Ibid.; Also see, International Planned Parenthood Federation, “1991 Annual Report,” 22; Also see, National STOPP News (November 30, 1993).

15. Douglas R. Scott, Bad Choices: A Look Inside Planned Parenthood (Franklin, Term.: Legacy Communications, 1992), 29.

16. George Grant, Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood (Franklin, TN: Legacy 1988, 1992)

17. George Grant, Immaculate Deception: The Shifting Agenda of Planned Parenthood, (Chicago, Ill.: Moody Press, 1996).

Chapter One

1. Illustrated London News (October 29, 1910).

2. Illustrated London News, (September 26, 1908).

3. James Killarney, Fulcrum of Vision (New York: Jamison, Talmidge, and Yeates, 1956), 458.

4. Gray, 19.

5. Ibid., 21.

6. Ibid., 16.

7. Ibid., 18.

8. Ibid.

9. Margaret Sanger, An Autobiography (New York: Dover, 1938).

Chapter Two

1. Illustrated London News (March 15, 1919).

2. Gray, Margaret Sanger, 38.

3. Ibid., 43.

4. Ibid.

5. Herman Schwartz, Margaret Sanger: A Biography (New York: Bell Tower, 1968), 44.

6. Ibid., 48.

Chapter Three

1. Illustrated London News (March 9, 1918).

2. Illustrated London News (August 16, 1930).

3. Lester McHenry, Fanatical Ideals: A History of the American Left (New York: Dillard Willings, 1931), 121.

4. Francis X. Gannon, A Biographical Dictionary of the Left { Belmont, Mass.: Western Islands, 1973), IV: 313.

5. Ibid., 317.

6. Ibid.

7. McHenry, Fanatical Ideals, 88.

8. Gannon, Biographical Dictionary IV: 313.

9. Ibid., 182.

Chapter Four

1. Illustrated London News (May 14, 1932).

2. Gray, 58-59.

Chapter Five

1. Illustrated London News (October 2, 1920).

2. Illustrated London News (April 14, 1917).

3. McHenry, Fanatical Ideals, 129.

4. James Cotton, Paris (London: Fallows Press, 1988), 36.

5. Albert Gringer, The Sanger Corpus: A Study in Militancy (Lakeland, Ala.: Lakeland Christian College, 1974), 473.

6. Ibid.

7. Ibid., 477.

7. Ibid., 481.

8. Ibid., 488.

9. William H. Bradenton, The Comstock Era: The Reformation of Reform (New York: Laddel Press, 1958), 276.

10. Gringer, Sanger Corpus, 489.

Chapter Six

1. Illustrated London News (May 14, 1927).

2. Allan Chase, The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism (New York: Knopf, 1977), 7.

3. Paul Johnson, A History of the English People (New York: Harper and Row, 1985), 276.

4. Ibid.

5. Germaine Greer, Sex and Destiny (New York: Harper and Row, 1984), 309.

6. Daniel Kevels, in the Name of Eugenics (New York: Penguin, 1985), 110.

7. Ibid.

8. Illustrated London News (February 14, 1925).

9. Ibid.

10. G.K. Chesterton, Eugenics and Other Evils (London: Cassell, 1922), 54.

Chapter Seven

1. Illustrated London News (September 27, 1919).

2. Illustrated London News (January 9, 1909).

3. Linda Gordon, Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right (New York: Penguin, 1974), 204.

4. Ibid.

5. Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization (New York: Brentano’s, 1922), 101.

6. Ibid., 108.

7. Ibid., 123.

Chapter Eight

1. Illustrated London News (December 4, 1920).

2. Washington Times (February 3, 1988).

3. Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, 23, 107, 126.

4. David Kennedy, Birth Control in America: The Career of Margaret Sanger (New Haven, Corm.: Yale, 1970), 113-18.

5* Gordon, Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right, 229- 334.

6. Ibid., 332.

7. Ibid.

8. Ibid.

9. Ibid.

10. Ibid., 333.

Chapter Nine

1. Illustrated London News (November 12, 1932).

2. Illustrated London News (October 21, 1905).

3. Margaret Sanger, cd., International Aspects of Birth Control: The International Neo-Malthusian and Birth Control Conference (New York: American Birth Control League, 1925), v.

4. Ibid., 5.

5. Ibid.

6. Ibid., 146.

7. Science 82 (March 1982).

8. Family Planning Perspectives (June 1970).

9. IPPF, Annual Report ( 1983).

10. IPPF, Family Planning Handbook for Doctors (1987).

11. IPPF, A Strategy for Legal Change (1981).

Chapter Ten

1. Illustrated London News (October 8, 1910).

2, Scott, Bad Choices, 233-70.

3. Ibid., 159-66.

Chapter Eleven

1. Illustrated London News (April 19, 1924).

2. Illustrated London News (August 5, 1933).

3. The Humanist (July 1986).

4. Margaret Sanger, Woman and the New Race (New York George Halter, 1928), 67.

5. Gray, Margaret Sanger, 88.

6. Wall Street Journal (December 19, 1984).

7. Leon Trotsky, My Life (New York: Scribners, 1931), 274.

8. David Goldstein, Suicide Bent (St. Paul, Minn.: Radio Replies, 1945), 72.

9. Planned Parenthood of Houston, Annual Report (1985)

Chapter Twelve

1. Illustrated London News (May 16, 1936).

2. USA Today (March 8, 1995).

3. Michael Scott Horton, Mission Accomplished (Nashville: Nelson, 1986), 11.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36126
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Re: Killer Angel: Biography of Margaret Sanger, by George Gr

Postby admin » Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:59 am

About the Author

George Grant is the director of the King’s Meadow Study Center, the editor of the Arx Axiom newsletter, and a teaching fellow at the Franklin Classical School. He is the author of more than two dozen books in the areas of history, biography, politics, literature, and social criticism, and he has written hundreds of essays, articles, and columns. His work on behalf of the homeless, for international relief and development, and for the sanctity of life has been profiled in such varied media outlets as ABC’s Nightline, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, CNN’s Crossfire, Family News in Focus, Moody Monthly, Christianity Today, World magazine, and many others. His best-selling expose of Planned Parenthood, Grand Illusions, after twelve printings and two editions in just six years, continues to serve the pro-life movement as a standard textbook.

Over the years, Dr. Grant has served as a radio and television commentator, apolitical campaign consultant, editorial director for three major publishing companies, and executive director for two national media outreach ministries. In addition to his regular classes in history, literature, and the arts at both the Franklin Classical School and the King’s Meadow Study Center, he maintains an active writing and speaking schedule in this country and around the world. He makes his home on a small farm in Tennessee with his wife and three children.

For information about speaking engagements, seminars, or conference schedules, contact: Ambassador Speakers Bureau, P. O. Box 50358, Nashville, TN 37205.

Other Books by George Grant

Bringing in the Sheaves: Transforming Poverty into Productivity

In the Shadow of Plenty: Biblical Principles for Welfare

The Dispossessed: Hopelessness in America

The Changing of the Guard: The Vital Role Christians Must Play in America’s Unfolding Cultural Drama

Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood

Trial and Error: The American Civil Liberties Union and Its Impact on Your Family

Third Time Around: The History of the Pro-Life Movement from the First Century to the Present

The Blood of the Moon: The Roots of the Middle East Crisis

The Quick and the Dead: RU-486 and the New Chemical Warfare Against Your Family

Hopelessness in America: Its Causes and Its Cures

The Last Crusader: The Untold Story of Christopher Columbus

Hilarious: The Wacky, Wit, Wisdom, and Wonderment of Hillary Rodham Clinton

Perot: The Populist Appeal of Strong-Man Politics

The 57% Solution: A Conservative Strategy for the Next Four Years

The Family Under Siege: What the New Social Engineers Have in Mind for Your Children

The Micah Mandate: Balancing the Christian Life

Theodore Roosevelt's Legacy of Leadership

Edited by George Grant

Where Do We Go From Here: An Agenda for Conservatives During Cultural Captivity

Homosexuality, the Military, and the Future: The Moral and Strategic Crisis Gays in the Military: A Caveat Collection

Written with Peter Leithart

The Catechism of the New Age: A Christian Response to Dungeons and Dragons

Clean Air: A Citizen's Handbook for Media Accountability

In Defense of Greatness: How Biblical Character Shapes a Nation's Destiny

The Walls Came Tumbling Down: The Fall of Communism in Our Time

Written with Peter Waldron

Rebuilding the Walls: A Biblical Strategy for Restoring Americans Greatness
 
Written with Mark Horne

Unnatural Affections: The Impuritan Ethic of Homosexuality and the Modern Church

Legislating Immorality The Homosexual Movement Comes Out of the Closet
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 36126
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 5:21 am

Previous

Return to Ancien Regime

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests